Rubric for Argumentation
Rubric for arguments to support claims in an analysis of
substantive topics or texts, using valid reasoning and relevant and sufficient
evidence.
A (90-100%) Exceed Expectation
Claims are insightful, engaging, clear, supportable and
debatable; effective organization establishes/presents relationships among
counterclaims, reasoning and evidence
Claims and counterclaims are fairly considered and
well-developed with convincing evidence while effectively anticipating audience
knowledge and concerns
Formal style and objective tone are consistently maintained
to effectively establish credibility throughout the writing; follows standard
English language conventions (in general minimal errors in grammar, spelling or
punctuation)
B (80-89%) Meets Expectation
Claims are clear, supportable and debatable; effective
organization establishes/presents relationships among counterclaims, reasoning
and evidence
Claims and counterclaims are considered and developed with
sufficient evidence while anticipating audience knowledge and concerns
Formal style and objective tone are maintained throughout
writing; follows standard English language conventions (in general few errors
in grammar, spelling or punctuation)
C (70-79%) Needs Improvement
Claims are identifiable; some organization is effective and
attempts to establish relationships among counterclaims, reasoning and evidence
Claims and counterclaims may not be fully developed and/or
may not be supported with sufficient evidence; limited evidence of
consideration of audience
Formal style and objective tone are not maintained
consistently throughout the writing; noticeable errors in standard English
language conventions (In general noticeable errors in grammar, spelling or
punctuation)
D (60-69%) Warning
Claims are unclear or not identifiable; organization is
ineffective and does not establish connections between/relationships among
counterclaims, reasoning and evidence
Claims and counterclaims are not developed and not
supported; limited evidence of consideration of audience
Does not maintain formal style and objective tone; errors in
standard English language conventions impede understanding
No comments:
Post a Comment